With Hillary Clinton’s reign of terror long over, the next Clinton is trying to make her way into the spotlight.
Chelsea Clinton is now trying to benefit from her family name and is using it to try and run for office eventually.
As if having two Clintons wasn’t bad enough, we may soon have a third.
Even “Vanity Affair” is begging the world not to let Chelsea get anywhere near a position of power.
Vanity Fair reports:
PLEASE, GOD, STOP CHELSEA CLINTON FROM WHATEVER SHE IS DOING
The last thing the left needs is the third iteration of a failed political dynasty.
Amid investigations into Russian election interference, perhaps we ought to consider whether the Kremlin, to hurt Democrats, helped put Chelsea Clinton on the cover of Variety. Or maybe superstition explains it. Like tribesmen laying out a sacrifice to placate King Kong, news outlets continue to make offerings to the Clinton gods.
In The New York Times alone, Chelsea has starred in multiple features over the past few months: for her tweeting (it’s become “feisty”), for her upcoming book (to be titled She Persisted), and her reading habits (she says she has an “embarrassingly large” collection of books on her Kindle). With Chelsea’s 2015 book, It’s Your World, now out in paperback, the puff pieces in other outlets—Elle, People, etc.—are too numerous to count.
One wishes to calm these publications: You can stop this now. Haven’t you heard that the great Kong is no more? Nevertheless, they’ve persisted. At great cost: increased Chelsea exposure is tied closely to political despair and, in especially intense cases, the bulk purchasing of MAGA hats. So let’s review: How did Chelsea become such a threat?
Vanity Fair may be left leaning, but they nailed it in this piece. Chelsea hasn’t earned her fame and reputation and she is merely benefiting from the Clinton name. If Liberals vote for Chelsea in anything, it will only show how idiotic they are and how they truly do not care about important issues.